Manipur Research Forum, Delhi Manipur Research Forum, Delhi Manipur Research Forum, Delhi
 
National Questions: Trajectories & Predicaments  
   
Current Activities
Manipur Research Forum regularly organises seminars, conferences, lectures and workshops.
Monthly Seminars
(every second Saturday) / Special Lecture:
April 2008:
Speaker: Nongmaithem Manichandra Singh, Lecturer, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi
Topic: “Issues in Food Grain Economy: A State Level Analysis of Manipur”
March 2008:
Speaker: Sumitra Thoidingjam, Lecturer, Janki Devi Memorial College, University
of Delhi
Topic: “A Post-colonial Reading of Kanhailal's Pebet as a Text of Cultural Resistance”
More >>
Photo Gallery
Photo Gallery
Click here >>
 
Those who are interested in presenting papers on various aspects of Northeast can write to mrfd.quarterly@gmail.com
 
 
Archived Section
Website
Articles
Contact Technical Queries
Duran Thiyam
Web Technical Consultant
cyberdura(@)yahoo(dot)com

Towards a Manipuri Nationalist History
By Bhagat Oinam

Towards a Manipuri Nationalist History
N. Sanajaoba, Manipur Puwari: Twenty-first Century (History of Manipur: Twenty-first Century), (text in Manipuri), (Imphal: Manipur Research Centre), (first published in 1997) 2006, Rs. 450.

Manipur Puwari is an engaged exercise, of an embedded praxis in constructing nationalist narrative. Through an alternate discourse on the history and politics of the North-East of India, it moves away from the standard Indian nationalist engagements to consolidate the nation state’s unification agenda. What has been attempted in the book is to show different trajectories in conceptualising the collective experiences of the people.

To highlight the narrative, two-fold methods are employed: first, to reject ‘merger’ thesis as propounded by the cohorts of the Indian state and the Manipur State Congress, and secondly, to enact an alternate thesis upholding the sovereignty of Manipur as an independent kingdom prior to the merger whereby establishing a politico-legal autonomy of Manipur. Such historical exercise not only denies the existing dominant discourse, but also traces a line completely different from the experiences of Indian nationalism and its proponents.

The methodological engagement employed in the book takes recourse to legal discourse to show invalidity of many of the treaties and arguments preserved as sacrosanct under the international law. The ‘Stand Still Agreement’ and ‘Instrument of Accession’ have been found wanting of basic minimum legal clauses on their structural framework. One such argument is that the treaties while primarily presume the status of equal autonomous political entities to come to an agreement; do not provide provisions where the constituting parties could quit the agreement. This is found to be flawed under jurisprudence.

By capturing the contemporary history of Manipur, the book points out the significance of peoples’ movement. The writer, for instance, sees many of the movements witnessed during the colonial and neo-colonial phases as spearheaded by the youths and women from lower strata of the society. On the other hand, the emerging middle class had been by and large engaged in enhancing and safeguarding its opportunistic interests. By tracing the history of the emergence of Manipur Congress, and subsequent split in the party, and finally few sections of the population representing one of these parties opting to get merged with India, the author opines, was one of the darkest phases in the history of Manipur.

 
Top
 
The author argues that since the region has not freed itself from the colonial yoke, the fate of the people in the region should not be scaled through the binary of colonial and post-colonial historiography. The erstwhile colonialism operating in the region had only graduated to neo-colonialism. End of British paramountcy on 14 August 1947 in many states in the sub-continent showed glimmer of freedom only to be shuttered down. ‘Annexation’ of Manipur as well as many ‘British un-administered areas’ into India is seen as the beginning of neo-colonial rule. Protests by the Nagas and the Manipuris, and subsequently by other ethnic groups are some highlights against this development. The author forcefully argues that a referendum should have been conducted and let the people decide on the issue of joining the Indian Union, if at all it was needed, through a democratic means. The repercussion of this misdeed is witnessed today in the form of intense widening of nationalist struggles all over the state, which has further spread to neighbouring states of the Northeast. The author draws legitimacy of the armed struggles in the region from UN’s agreement on Indigenous Peoples’ rights to self determination, which was the result of intense internationalisation of the armed movement in the state since 1995.

While the author brings to forefront the rightful claims of the marginalized and the vanquished, there is an indication to all the torchbearers among the claimants of the rightful forms of an ideal nationalist struggle. The book covertly attempts to fill in the moral vacuum that is presently witnessed in the nationalist struggles of the subdued and the marginalized. However, the book does not seem to acknowledge this concern, and instead focuses primarily on legal discourse. What the book needs to strongly highlight is that Right to Self Determination can become a rightful claim only when claimed with strong moral commitment in addition to fulfilling right legal procedure. The book also highlights that the idea of self-determination should not be seen merely as a political programme but must also as economic.

The effort of the book is to interiorise aspirations of Manipuri nationalism based on a long trajectory of collective experiences of various ethnic groups in the state. This, of course, is easier said than done. The book falls short of coming out with this position as clearly as it ought to have.
 
 
Top